Condo board sues residents over flowers

A New Hampshire woman has racked up $13,800 in penalties for refusing to remove her daisies and irises. The board argues that all the grounds are common areas.

By Teresa at MSN Real Estate Mar 26, 2012 12:12PM

A New Hampshire homeowner is facing a penalty of more than $13,800 because her condo association doesn't like her flowers.

 

Kimberly Bois planted a garden at her Portsmouth, N.H., condominium in 2008 with the permission of the developer. Her blooms include daisies, bearded irises, lavender, hydrangeas and tulips, some of which came from heirloom plants in her late mother's garden.

 

Last fall, her condo association demanded that she remove the flowers and now is asking her to pay for contractors approved by the association to rip them out. She has received 13 registered letters demanding that she cease and desist in growing her garden. A fine of $25 a day grew to $50 a day. So far, the association says she owes $5,800 in fines and $8,000 in attorney fees and has placed a lien on her unit.

 

Post continues below

 

Kimberly Bois holds a computer showing the flowers she planted at her condo in Portsmouth, N.H. 

Credit: Deb Cram photo/Seacoastonline.com
"It's the stupidest thing I've encountered in my life," Bois told Seacoast Online.

She and a neighbor, who is also facing condo association opposition to her garden, have hired attorney Paul McEachern to fight their cases. "I guess it just goes to show that a condominium is the worst form of democracy ever invented," McEachern told Seacoast Online. "They probably have less stringent rules in a penitentiary."

The condo association argues that the grounds are a common area and that individual unit owners can't determine what goes there. Atlantic Pointe association attorney Sandy Roberts said the developer told Bois years ago that the permission to plant flowers was temporary and that a future association could change the rules, which is what happened.

"The developer created a problem for everyone," Roberts told Seacoast Online. "The practical implication is that what one person thinks is beautiful, another person thinks is horrible. Whether you like it or not is not the issue." 

13Comments
Sat 12:23 AM
avatar
The most ridiculous and pathetic reasoning possible! What an idiotic association!!
May 4, 2013 6:04AM
avatar

A condo, in reality, is nothing more than an apartment.  It's just more expensive.

Either way, if the "powers that be" choose to have only grass, I might not like the shade of greed, or the chemicals they choose to use in maintaining it.... I may not like the tree, shrub, or flower varieties they decide to use.... but they demand that I live the way they dictate.

 

The thing is, even when you own your own home and there is no neighborhood association, a town or city or someone will set certain standards you must adhere to.  The question, then, is whether the standards being dictated are reasonable; or have changed in such a way to have become unreasonable or unfairly costly to an individual.

 

To be a full or partial owner of a property "should" mean you have some say in how it is used and maintained.  This woman was allowed to have her garden, which is apparently something she enjoyes maintaining.  As long as it is well-maintained and does not prevent another from reasonable use or access of their part of the property, and does not cost others more is it really reasonable to demand she give up something that makes it "home" for her?  If the plants she maintains are not noxious or poisonous or illegal by law; the color or variety should make no difference.  If the plants are within a reasonable proximity to her unit, patio, or deck and don't interfere with regular maintainance of the grounds it costs no one extra.

 

Just another example of someone getting far too much power and carrying it too far just because they "can".

Jul 22, 2012 5:03AM
avatar
We the people must find a way to have homes without some HOA or condo ASSociation. We pay for where we live. Unless he condo associate or HOA is responsible for the grounds and their upkeep it is none of their business. Anyone have any good ideas on how to get rid of these associations and give power to the people again? 

My HOA is very nice and pretty much lets people do what they want. But a neighbor has used them as a legal hammer to punish me on any and every infraction, real or imagined, over a noise complaint. 

It is time for the people to take back their power and stop asking the government and other organized organizations to think for us. 
Jul 22, 2012 4:14AM
Jul 22, 2012 4:05AM
avatar
what a bunch of ****S who doesn't like flowers i hope that women sues them back and winds up winning the complex then she can tell them were to go in no uncertain terms
Jul 15, 2012 7:38AM
avatar
Anyone know how to dissolve an HOA legally? 
Jun 25, 2012 12:36PM
avatar
I certainly know about bad HOA's I've lived with a few.  I'm now on the board at my new place and I'm basically in charge of landscaping and the exterior.  We got a new management company and they wanted to enforce strict guidelines of what people could have on their patios and balconies.  I talked them into really easing their standards.  It's important for people to feel their home is their personal haven.  Just because their taste doesn't agree with me doesn't mean there is something wrong with it.  As long as it isn't a safety hazard and other owners aren't complaining I say live and let live.  My biggest concern is taking care of the deferred maintenance in the common areas so residents can really enjoy their homes.  But I guess some people feel they need to be king over everyone else. Sad.
May 12, 2012 4:55AM
avatar

I lived in a modular home community for 71/2 years with no issues and then new management took oveer and a HOA started walking the streets telling us who could have what on our property we were paying rent on(land)  and then began taking tag numbers down and asking who the visitors were to the resident.  I packed up and left within the nest 3 years leaving my home for them and the bank to sort out.  Life wasn't worth living under the curcumstances.

Apr 30, 2012 5:09PM
avatar
Another reason NOT to live in a condo with the dumb HOA! Then again, I guess some people don't mind all the rules & regs! I sure as heck would.....dumbest thing for these lawyers to fight over.Maybe a vote should be taken as to whether the other condo owners mind?
Apr 30, 2012 3:30PM
Apr 28, 2012 2:29AM
avatar
Yet another reason why I would never, EVER, live in a place that is bound by a HOA.  If it's my property, then I should be able to plant what I want, paint my house the color I want, put up flags as my mood and sentiment moves me, without some tyrannical body of self-appointed dictators telling me whether or not I can!
Apr 11, 2012 6:04AM
avatar
I think the people on the homeowners association need to get a life.
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

About Teresa Mears

Teresa Mears

Teresa Mears is a veteran journalist who has been interested in houses since her father took her to tax auctions to carry the cash at age 10. A former editor of The Miami Herald's Home & Design section, she lives in South Florida where, in addition to writing about real estate, she publishes Miami on the Cheap to help her neighbors adjust to the loss of 60% of their property value.

FIND YOUR DREAM HOME OR APARTMENT

or

WHAT'S YOUR HOME WORTH?

    

HOME IMPROVEMENT PROFESSIONALS

Find local plumbers, electricians, contractors and more.

from our partners