Will plan put the 'service' back in 'loan servicing'?

The new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is proposing new rules for how mortgage servicers deal with borrowers. Will it make them more accountable?

By Teresa at MSN Real Estate Apr 10, 2012 1:35PM

The new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is proposing rules the agency hopes will help the country avoid another housing crisis.

 

While we don't see anything that will keep your home from losing 50% of its value, the bureau is proposing a radical overhaul in how loan servicers deal with customers.

 

Adding a little customer service to mortgage servicing is part of the plan.

 

"The mortgage servicing rules we are considering reflect two basic, common-sense principles – no surprises and no runarounds," CFPB Director Richard Cordray said in a news release. "For too long, mortgage servicers have not been held accountable to their customers, and the result has been profoundly punishing to homeowners in distress. It's time to put the 'service' back in mortgage servicing."

 

Post continues below

 

Woman writing check (© Corbis)The new rules are in response to complaints about how lenders deal with their customers. The bureau wants loan servicers to, at a minimum, post payments when they are received, warn borrowers when interest rates are about to rise and explain options before adding expensive

"force-placed" insurance.

Congress mandated that the new rules be drawn up. The CFPB will formally propose specific regulations this summer, ask for public comment and enact final rules in January.

The CFPB says the new rules are aimed at two problems: lack of transparency and lack of accountability.

"In recent years, many borrowers have complained that they did not receive the information they needed to help avoid foreclosure," the CFPB writes. "Other borrowers’ troubles worsened because they found it difficult to get answers from their servicers, or get errors corrected when they occurred."

 

These are among the proposed rules:

  • Clear monthly mortgage statements.Servicers would have to send regular statements that show how payments break down into principal, interest, fees and escrow. If borrowers are behind, the notices should give them information about how to avert foreclosure.
  • Warnings before interest-rate adjustments.Borrowers with adjustable-rate loans should be told when the rate will change and what to do if they can't afford the new payments.
  • Ways to avoid expensive "force-placed" insurance. The rule would require advance notice and pricing information.
  • Information on ways to avoid foreclosure.Servicers would have to try to contact borrowers in danger of foreclosure and advise them of their options. Plus, if the borrower calls the lender, the servicer would have to provide "timely, complete and accurate information" about options.
Rules under consideration also would require immediate crediting of payments, up-to-date and accessible records, quick correction of errors and easy access to foreclosure-prevention staff. (Is anyone else appalled we have to have an act of Congress to get this basic level of service?)

 

Just as a refresher, The Associated Press explains the role of the mortgage servicer:

A mortgage servicer collects payments from the borrower on behalf of a loan's owner and typically handles customer service, escrow accounts, collections, loan modifications and foreclosures. Most borrowers do not choose their mortgage servicers. The owner of a loan frequently is not the original lender, even when the original lender is the servicer.

What do you think? Would these rules help?

269Comments
Apr 10, 2012 4:14PM
avatar

Don't forget people, that god is in control of everything he will deal with  wrong doing people also the one's that has been stealing and wrongfully kicking people out of there homes, so dont depend on the banks keeping you in your homes know that god will if you ask him....

 

Apr 10, 2012 4:14PM
avatar
It will do nothing.

For those of you who think it is all about jobs and Obama and banks, try this,

America got in the habit of outsourcing work to other countries way back in the 70's. As a result we have had to prop up our GDP with something. For a while we had mining,steel,oil,fishing, etc etc.

That changed, as all things do, and we had a strong manufacturing base along with our natural resource programs.

Then we got into high tech and found out that our manufacturing could be done cheaper, so we lost most of the manufacturing base. Well, what else do we have? Oh, we have land and construction.........and the end result was people who wrote loans and mortgages to those people who didn't even have enough income to buy food, and the bottom dropped.........
Some of this is the banks fault, but, WE are all guilty of it to. WE all thought the growth and super economy would continue. Even when it started to fall the public disregarded the signs and continued to over-spend and over-extend right up to the full blow out.

There really is no way to stop this kind of thing, but, if there was another entity to draw on for our GDP the crash would not have been as bad.

To correct we need to match every industry equally with another industry, i.e. auto industry and metal production and foundries IN THE SAME COUNTRY!

More laws and regulations just add to MORE screw-overs and more fraud.

The more you tighten you grip the more things slip through your fingers.

Apr 10, 2012 4:14PM
avatar
You know what else?   I can't qualify for a lower interest re-fi loan, because my balance isn't BIG enough to be profitible for the big mortgage companies!!!!!  But someone else who has a mortgage payment they can't afford because they got talked iinto a house they couldn't afford, they are the ones that are getting the ridiculously low interest rates.  My credit rating was in the 790's  and I couldn't qualify for a re-fi loan.
Apr 10, 2012 4:08PM
avatar

of course everyone wants to pay there bills on time, but when you have lost your job and looking very hard for another, what are you suppose to do dummy ( ruth) you may not be in foreclosure, but it's a lot of us that have been through it....don't speak to soon about paying your bills on time because what goes around will come back around to you!!! smh

  

Apr 10, 2012 4:05PM
avatar
If everyone should be accountable for their own actions then most of the banks would be bankrupt.  The Fed would be printing money to stop the bank runs but yet all this time later and not one fraudulent banker in prison.  Hmm.  Bernie Madhoff is a saint compared to many of the bank executives.  Let's look at Countrywide, is Mozillo doing any time even though he violated SEC rules as he told investors everything was fine as he was selling all of his stock?
Apr 10, 2012 3:58PM
avatar
This is one of the most lame **** Acts I have seen this ridiculous Progressive Congress come up with.  Wow this country has become such a nanny country it's unbelievable!!!!  What happened to this country, our parents, parents never needed any of this type of crap.  Our country is falling apart, what happened to mature individuals taking responsibility for their own actions.
Apr 10, 2012 3:57PM
avatar
ruth burkhead ,i agree very simple. most of all when you don't have a clue don't enter into a conversation !!  take some time to familiarize yourself with the antics of the banks that the public bailed out (when they were the perpetrators of this fiasco). then try to comprehend that the banks, it's officers and several people in government designed and put into place,the very actions that resulted in crippling this country !!!
Apr 10, 2012 3:53PM
avatar
HARP isn't mandatory.  That's why I'm so thankful to live in a non recourse anti-deficiency state.  Think, responsible homeowners with $400 more a month due to a lower interest rate.  That just might help the economy as they would surely part with some of it.  However, on Marketplace (A progam on NPR), they interviewed some of the executives and they said all consumers would do is save the money.  Basically they are saying it's best that the bank keeps your money.  They have a bottom line to look after you know.
Apr 10, 2012 3:53PM
avatar
And what about the customers (you know, the ones that actually borrowed the money and signed a contract saying they would pay it back) ?  Are they going to be held accountable too ?
Apr 10, 2012 3:51PM
avatar
The banks are about to ruin the entire world's economy.  More quickly than most people would like to realize, the average person's credit score or financial situation will be bad enough that there will be no incentive to even try to pay back the $1 trillion in student loans, or any other large debt people have.  Once this happens, the Federal Reserve won't have the option of just printing another $7.7 trillion to hand over to the banks again.  The choice will be to either let the entire banking system collapse on its worthless self, or forever ruin the value of the dollar.  The current system is not sustainable, and a study by MIT this week shows that the entire world will be in a Great Depression by 2030 because there is nothing left to suck out of people.  Kind of ironic since the banks were established mostly to protect the currency.  They single handedly destroyed it.
Apr 10, 2012 3:49PM
avatar
I don't care if there's an election this year or not: these rules (and frankly, more) are needed. I hope they also require borrowers to be given notice when either their mortgage holder or their servicer changes. Too many people got in trouble from not even knowing where their payments should be sent.
avatar

Total BS and avoidance of the REAL problem; a loan is a loan, no secondary markets, no jewing-and-screwing on wall street. no derivatives and  no more 'financial innovation'.

 

no government guarantees, no more bailouts. a loan is a loan.

 

bad loans? lose money!

 

Apr 10, 2012 3:47PM
avatar

For the record, I am not near foreclosure.  Sorry a little long but here is my official complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.  So far no word back yet.  Maybe if enough people want action, something tangible will change.

 

Describe what happened so we can understand the issue...
In early February 2012, I spoke with Steven, mortgage specialist from my personal bank, US Bank. I inquired about HARP refinancing for my existing loan through Wells Fargo. He advised me to go through Wells Fargo as it might save me appraisal fees. Otherwise, I should call him back if he can help me further. He gave me the number for Anne, a Wells Fargo mortgage rep. After several calls, she informed me that my loan did not qualify for he HARP program but she could help me with a conventional loan. Apparently, she contacted Steven and told him I did not qualify as he left a voicemail on my cell phone indicating he knew that I did not quality but I should call him because he will beat Wells Fargo’s prices A contact with Ryan, Wells Fargo in Baraboo, WI, had similar results. I also contacted Gregory from Wells Fargo via email. At first he indicated I did qualify but in later emails informed me I did not. He informed me the HARP program was coming out with new qualifying loans March 19 and I should contact him then, which I did. I did not hear from any of them again. On March 22 I contacted Mike, a Wells Fargo mortgage rep from the 800 number. He said my loan did not qualify. He also stated that he had 2 calls yesterday with the exact same situation. When I pressed for more explanation, he commented “It looks like this is up to our discretion.” I asked what he meant by that. He then stated that my PMI company, Genworth, did not participate in HARP. He said he would need to do some more research and call me back. He did not. On 3/22 I spoke with Sara from Genworth and she indicated they fully participate and that you can even apply on-line to speed the process. On 3/26 I called Wells Fargo and spoke with Jerry who said my loan did not qualify. After questioning further, he stated it was due to Genworth. When I told him I had spoken with Genworth he transferred me to Nicole in customer service who transferred me to Josh, Home Consultant Specialist with Wells Fargo. After explaining the situation, Josh stated that there was nothing he could do for me. I then specifically asked him, even though my loan qualifies under HARP and Genworth, Wells Fargo is choosing not to let me participate in this federal program. He replied yes and he cannot provide me with any assistance and that I should call back in a month. I believe Wells Fargo is preventing me from participating in a federal program for which I qualify and they have conspired with at least one other bank to prevent my access.

 

Desired resolution
What do you think would be a fair resolution to your issue?
I would like Wells Fargo to cease their deceptive practices and be held accountable for providing misleading and fraudulent information to consumers. I would like to participate in a federal program for which I am qualified at the benefit level I otherwise would have if not for their widespread, dishonest tactics.
Auto-Response 04/01/2012 07:00 PM
Thank you for contacting the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

We have received your complaint (Case number: *******************)​ and will send it to your company as soon as possible.

You can track your complaint at: ********************​******

In the meantime, if you’re having trouble paying your mortgage and want to be connected to a free, HUD-approved housing counselor, call (855) 411-CFPB. Special assistance may be available to military members or veterans.

Thank you,
Consumer Response Team

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
consumerfinance.gov
(855) 411-CFPB (2372)
Apr 10, 2012 3:45PM
avatar
It's really simple.  The banks made the mess and now they want the taxpayers in addition to their bailout want conventional mortgage people to pay them more juice than the people that can't afford their mortgage to keep their bottom line.  I had a credit rating of almost 800 and Bank of America said that I didn't qualify for a 4% loan.  My neighbor that fell under the HAMP program did of course because his house payment was greater than 34% of his gross income.  I didn't qualify because I made too much money and had no problems paying my mortgage.  I even offered $40K because the home was under water due to them messing up the real estate market.  They said they didn't follow HARP so my only options were to keep paying the mortgage or lose the home and wait until my credit was good enough to qualify for another mortgage.  I told them I would buy a home outright cash because the I could now afford it since they drove the AZ home prices down so much with their foolish lending.  AZ is a non recourse anti-deficiency state which means I walk away free and clear.  All the bank can do is take the home.  I have no second mortgages so they can't do anything to me.  The tax laws were also changed so the deficiency isn't taxable as long as it forecloses by year end.  June 30 will be a happy day.  I lose a 2300 sq ft home and I already purchased a 3000 sq ft home cash.  If you can afford a mortgage because you always did things the right way as in conventional mortgage, then they want you to pay for your neighbor so they don't have to take a loss on a foolish loan they made and your neighbor with bad credit gets a better interest rate than you do.  They figure if your home is under water then you are stuck.  Chase and Wells Fargo finally came around and honored the HARP program.  BAC did not and they let me know that.  They also informed me of "Bail and Buy" a law that the bank lobbyists had put through to stop people from mortgaging a second home to dump the first one making it mortgage fraud.  It doesn't stop cash however because that's not a mortgage.  Debt free because I tried to do it the right way but was outright told no.  Now who's the idiot there.  No mortgage, no car payments, no debt.  Thanks Bank of America, just as the commercial says, "You've got me covered."

Apr 10, 2012 3:45PM
avatar
Cant pay your mortgage when you loose your job and cant find another one due to the Obama administration discriminating against white people and favoring minorites. K you sound like one of those idiot liberals that caused this mess in the 1st place. Thanks to the Clinton adminstration forcing banks to give out subprime loans to minorities! And Obummer sticking to all of us that are w/o jobs except minorities. November 2012 will tell the story, bye bye liberal fools!
Apr 10, 2012 3:43PM
avatar

I was forced to pay for insurance I didnt want-and when I needed it they gave me the run around-house got forclosed on-cause the lender sold the note and refused my payment. 8 months after loseing the house (to what I was told was illegal) they are still charging me for insurance.

the lender would never answer my calls and even when I had an agreement in place-they didnt hold up to their end. My house sold for 180k less then what I paid-and the price it sold for-I could have handled the payments-now I am homeless, jobless (and thanks to the libaray for internet) have very few places to take my family. this system should have been fixed years ago-or at least have them follow the exisiting rules that are currently in place.

avatar

regulation stifles free enterprise

 

we now live in a socialist state

Apr 10, 2012 3:40PM
avatar
where was this 3 years ago?...Can you say election year ploy?...thought ya could.
Apr 10, 2012 3:37PM
avatar
The SEC oversaw bernie madoff for over 20 years. How many BILLIONS and BILLION did we give them to "oversee" and protect the public? Yea right... We know what these guys are gonna do. There gonna pass a ton of starky rules that will cost the borrowers more, shift the paper work to the fed (consumer protection bereau of which no one will enforce or pay attention to.
Apr 10, 2012 3:31PM
avatar
This is garbage, Teresa. And I am pretty sure you know it.
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

About Teresa Mears

Teresa Mears

Teresa Mears is a veteran journalist who has been interested in houses since her father took her to tax auctions to carry the cash at age 10. A former editor of The Miami Herald's Home & Design section, she lives in South Florida where, in addition to writing about real estate, she publishes Miami on the Cheap to help her neighbors adjust to the loss of 60% of their property value.

FIND YOUR DREAM HOME OR APARTMENT

or

WHAT'S YOUR HOME WORTH?

    

HOME IMPROVEMENT PROFESSIONALS

Find local plumbers, electricians, contractors and more.

from our partners