Former Fannie Mae chief: Don't blame homeowners for bust

Franklin Raines, who left Fannie in 2004, says investors, not homeowners or the government, are responsible for the crisis. Others disagree, and some blame Fannie Mae.

By Teresa at MSN Real Estate Apr 23, 2012 1:17PM

© Exactostock/SuperStockInvestors, not homeowners, were responsible for the real-estate crash, according to the former chief executive of Fannie Mae.

 

Franklin Raines, who left Fannie Mae in 2004, made his comments last week at a National Community Reinvestment Coalition challenge.

 

He challenged the contention that the crisis was caused by homeowners who bought when they shouldn't have or bought more home than they could afford. Government policies to encourage homeownership also were not to blame, he said.

 

Post continues below

 

"This has nothing to do with the average American family wanting to own a home," Raines said, according to The Wall Street Journal. "This was rank speculation that was being financed out of Wall Street with no questions asked. That is what caused this crisis. Blaming people — ordinary people — who tried to own a home for this crisis is simply wrong."

 

Numerous politicians, pundits and organizations have sought to place the blame for the crisis on various players: homeowners, lenders, the government, Fannie Mae and others. U.S. Housing Update lists 10 reasons for the bust, including speculators and loose lending.

A Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission report issued in January 2011 blamed "widespread failures in financial regulation; dramatic breakdowns in corporate governance; excessive borrowing and risk-taking by households and Wall Street; policymakers who were ill-prepared for the crisis; and systemic breaches in accountability and ethics at all levels."

 

But commission member Peter Wallison wrote a dissent casting blame on Fannie Mae. He wrote in an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal: "Far from being a marginal player, Fannie Mae was the source of the decline in mortgage underwriting standards that eventually brought down the financial system. It led rather than followed Wall Street into risky lending."

Another speaker at the conference, Richard Cordray, director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, took issue with the assertion that the Community Reinvestment Act, passed in 1977 in an effort to make credit available for home purchases in low-income neighborhoods, was the cause of the bust. He said: "Some have argued that the Community Reinvestment Act is responsible for the mortgage crisis. We disagree. Sound underwriting and reasonable access to credit are both worthy goals and they can and should go hand in hand as we build stronger communities."

What do you think? What role, if any, did homeowners and government policy to encourage homeownership have in causing the bust?

547Comments
Jun 9, 2012 8:43PM
avatar

As with free mortgages... IF IT IS TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE, WELL IT IS!!!!

 

You all got played into bankruptcy with our government.. NEVER TRUST A BANKER! These GLOBAL capitalist bankers now control the world. AUSTERITY and third world status HERE WE ARE!!! Enjoy the high unemployemnt, no retirement, and lost savings. Your global bankers (Federal Reserver) THANK YOU for your funds!!!!!

Jun 9, 2012 8:41PM
avatar
I think the crisis has many causes, some related, some not.  You could look to the Federal Reserves constant rate increases leading up to the crisis.  This whole thing started with an increase in defaults on sub-prime loans.  Of course it ballooned into much more, but looking back, there were so many sub-prime loans that were variable rate.  When the loans were initiated, interest rates were extremely low due to the dot-com bust and 9/11.  As the economy picked up steam, the Fed started a series of 1/4 point rate increases that pushed up interest rates dramatically.  As time went on, investors started noticing the increase in defaults on sub-prime.  This seemed to be the catalyst that eroded confidence in the markets and led to the economic collapse.  The panic spread from sub-prime loans to conventional loans.  Then the whole pricing structure of housing came into question.  And of course all of those mortgages that were sold to investors as mortgage backed securites lost value.   So all of this goes back to the way the Fed manipulates interest rates and investors trying to capitalize on that.
Jun 9, 2012 8:39PM
avatar
Sorry ppl that we all suffer the ones that are in charge  well you know  the saying 30 grand on a hammer 100 million on a toilet set cover  Let us raise  the debt so they do this with out us having a say
Hmmm  welcome to N.W.O no that is not the new world order   N.W.O means Nazi,World,Order not what they want you to think New is not Nazi is
look at how the Nazi did things and look at how or Government  is running  same thing as them different  time fram

Jun 9, 2012 8:33PM
avatar
Its the banks fault with their mickey mouse loans and prepayment penalties, and giving anyone with a pulse a mortgage, im sure if I tried i could of got a mortgage under my dogs name
Jun 9, 2012 8:28PM
avatar
Typical nonsense.  The people who made the loans to folks who couldn't afford them aren't responsible.  The people who took loans they couldn't fford aren't to blame.  The Government that encouraged both of them to act irresponsibly isn't to blame.  It's all the fault of the investors who supplied and lost the money.  Typical Democrat BS!
Jun 9, 2012 8:28PM
avatar

The thing most people miss here is that the big banks played them into bankrupsy, forced the politicians to promote globalization which caused the lost of jobs and enslaved us all in debt. Thus, with globalization, every American will have to accept any low paying job, with less benefits, etc for maximum profit by corporations and banks.

Banks now control the governments and the world with all those lovely customers.

 

You all got played and you all let it happen by not preventing CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS by the ultra rich corporations and banks, and NOTcontrolling government debt to these pr*cks.

 

You all made your beds now sleep in them.

Jun 9, 2012 7:58PM
avatar
Another issue that it doesn't seem anyone is bringing up is not just with the banks/mortgage companies but how real estate prices became super inflated which led to these higher loans where more money was lost when the borrower defaulted.   We bought our house for 73K.  Four years later we were being told it was worth 105K.   Houses in our neighborhood that were tiny little two bedrooms were selling for 100-120K when they realistically should only have been worth under 100K, probably more in the 80K range.   We ended up moving out of where we had been living and my husband finding another job out of the area because we had outgrown our house after having two kids and needed another bedroom (our house was only a small 2 bedroom bungalow and the bedrooms were small.  We had our son's crib in the hallway.)  We looked for a 3 bedroom and were totally priced out of the area.  There wasn't a decent 3 bedroom in a decent area for under 150K and we didn't feel comfortable with the payment that 150K house would cost us even though we were both professionals with college degrees working full time.  We ended up moving to a small town where my husband found a job making more money and found a nice house for 76K that is FAR bigger than anything we looked at where we used to live that we couldn't afford anyway.   The ridiculously inflated housing prices had a lot to do with this mess too.  
Jun 9, 2012 7:57PM
avatar

Most appear to overlook the fact that many people could well afford their house payment - UNTIL - they lost their job.  The real problem was the downturn in the economy.  The Burst didn't cause the recession.  The recession caused the Housing Problems.

 

Had people kept their jobs - they could have made their house payments.

Jun 9, 2012 7:54PM
avatar
wow what a bunch of monday morning quarterbacks! Thanks  for the BS. The facts are simple and undisputable, so why cant we repeal everything back 30 years and swallow the the pill and move forward? We can be great again but we have to stop whining and move on. Kick out the mexicans, bring back our jobs and bring home our troops.   The simplest answer is best.
Jun 9, 2012 7:48PM
avatar
Totally agree, greedy investors are the ones that caused the R.E. mess. It will happen again, may take a while but it will go hay wire in the next 15 yrs. 
Jun 9, 2012 7:48PM
avatar

I think the mortagage crisis is caused by banking and wall street greed. But what I don't understand is that the government bailed out the big banks! But don't help the people refinance their loans at our low interests because the the mortagage is underwater? It's under water because of the the lost in value and the lost of jobs in this economy. I didn't buy to flip! But how can I get these lower rates?

Jun 9, 2012 7:47PM
avatar
first it is the responsibilty of the buyer to know what they can afford ....i do agree with former Fannie Mae exec that investor control what they want and when they want it ...look at big corporations large incvestment groups control the flow of what they want...as AMERICANS it is time we say no more ...time for us to get out of debt and control our money not banks.... thinking we are going to get rich over night not going to happen when u get paid by the hour....and hey lay off the Pres look at who is trying to save the working class while the mighty few find ways to stop everything to help bring the housing market back with decent rates  and  jobs
Jun 9, 2012 7:47PM
avatar
TERD KNEW JUST WHEN TO RUN AWAY- NO WIT , NO BRAINS, NO WAY TO WIN. THATS ALL TERD DOES.... RUNS AND RUNS AND RUNS.... FROM HIMSELF/HERSELF/ITSELF/$HITSELF.  TERD, EVENTUALLY YOU WILL TIRE AND NOT BE ABLE TO RUN ANY MORE.  WOULD NOT WANT TO BE YOU WHEN YOU GET THAT LOOK AT WHAT YOU REALLY ARE, WHEN YOU REALIZE THAT YOUR A LEECH. THE SELFLOATHE YOU MUST FEEL.....
Jun 9, 2012 7:47PM
avatar

"He challenged the contention that the crisis was caused by homeowners who bought when they shouldn't have or bought more home than they could afford."

 who does he think the investors sold the home to?     

Jun 9, 2012 7:42PM
avatar

Let me try to explain this to people that have no idea. You had a system where the person who was in charge of rating mortgage backed securities was also the same person getting paid to help put the deal through.

 

Let me give you an example. When you buy a home an appraiser sets the value and gets paid a small fee. What would happen if that appraiser instead of getting a small fee, that appraiser was getting a third of the house price along with the same as the owner and the bank.

 

In all cases that would be fraud because the person setting the price pushed the price up. This is called price fixing.

 

Now instead of punishing the greed of Wall Street policies and practices they get 900 more billion to get bailed out by Bush; whose family had connections to the people doing the price fixing.  The bonding people were getting as much as the banks for rating mortgage bonds with an inflated price. On the average the bonding companies were getting as much money as the banks and in a lot cases more.

 

Then you have people like your self who worry about setting aside money for unexpected expenditures, when the policy was set up for a few to make a lot of money and then for the system to collapse.

 

It was not the homeowner or the community reinvest act it was simple greed of few who got away with murder and helped kill our country. 

 

Jun 9, 2012 7:40PM
avatar
Why is it that people will offer their strong, sure opinions without ever checking a few facts first?
There can be NO DOUBT that the housing market played a big part in the crash.
We all witnessed it.
BUT, how many people stopped to do a little simple math before swallowing that widely repeated tale that "it was because of all those high risk loans (sub-prime mortgages) that the gov't forced the banks to lend to people that defaulted - THAT'S the reason"............?
There were MANY reasons, but if you want that one to play the major part, you'll have to prove it mathematically.
Use whatever figures you want from any source you want, max out the worse case scenario, and show me how much money it would total if every subprime loan in America went belly up. 
When that doesn't add up, try using the figure of EVERY home loan in America went default.
That will get you to about $10 trillion, if everyone in America got foreclosed.

The total loss is still being calculated, but $5-6 trillion is close.
At the height of the crisis, the foreclosure figure approached 10%, and averaged out to about 5%. That's the approximate number now.
So.......since we know not every foreclosure was a subprime, and the total foreclosures is 5% of the market......that equals about 1/2 a trillion dollars.

Care to explain what happened to the rest?
Or  are you going to insist that 2 or 3% of homeowners (the ones with the least money, right) managed to take down the world's greatest economy all by themselves?

You might want to investigate what "leveraging" in the banking world is all about before accepting that class warfare rhetoric y'all are so fond of condemning. 
 
Jun 9, 2012 7:40PM
avatar

Our home purchased in 2007 is worth only 80% of it's original purchase price.  Over half of the homes in our town home community were sold to investors who purchased them when they were at 80% of our purchase price.  Some of these investors have sold fearing  further decline in their property value thus causing a decline in overall property values.  So I agree partly with the Fannie Mae Chief that investors fueled this decline, but greed played a large part in this process.  I've been a Real Estate Broker for 24 years and can't recall so many cases of mortgage fraud, 100% loans with ARM rates and lack of proper credit and income verifications.  When I started in the business first time homebuyers had to attend a homeownership education class, there was Ameri Dream and Nehemiah to help with downpayment assistance, you could receive a gift from a relative and there were downpayment and low interest assistance programs through State and Local Housing Authorities.  In all my 24 years I can only recall 8 families losing their home through foreclosure and the minimum credit score requirements were 550 FHA and VA.  The Banks need to lighten up and get back to loaning money again by getting back to the basics.  When you have to put a little time and effort in to purchase your home you appreciate it more and are less likely to walk away when the going gets tough.

avatar
Goodnight Terd runaway you know when to quit...you are defenseless when it comes to brains.  Now runaway with your tail between your legs.
Jun 9, 2012 7:37PM
avatar
I think the bulk of the blame does belong on the backs of the mortgage companies/banks for being far too free with lending.  I knew when I was hearing commercials on the radio and TV touting loans without even a credit check that it was going to lead to trouble.  However, you can't totally hold the people that went for these loans blameless either.  You have to have common sense.  Even if a bank tells you they'll give you a loan for X amount you should still ask yourself if you can really afford it.   I knew people who were making less money than what my husband and I were making together that were buying 250-350K houses and I wondered how in the heck they could possibly afford the payments when we bought a house under 100K and our payments were almost at the max we could afford.   Realistically in a situation like this it's rarely one single entity's fault, it's usually a combination. In this case I agree with the Commission report that said it was failures in financial regulation, corporate governance, the borrowers, Wall Street, and policymakers.  
Jun 9, 2012 7:36PM
avatar

Goodnight all! It was fun. Thanks to all who did not respond and kept on the subject!

It was many factors that crashed the market and many are to blame but, sitting around blaming people is not going to solve this problem and it is going to take many years to get back on track.

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

About Teresa Mears

Teresa Mears

Teresa Mears is a veteran journalist who has been interested in houses since her father took her to tax auctions to carry the cash at age 10. A former editor of The Miami Herald's Home & Design section, she lives in South Florida where, in addition to writing about real estate, she publishes Miami on the Cheap to help her neighbors adjust to the loss of 60% of their property value.

FIND YOUR DREAM HOME OR APARTMENT

or

WHAT'S YOUR HOME WORTH?

    

HOME IMPROVEMENT PROFESSIONALS

Find local plumbers, electricians, contractors and more.

from our partners