Renters live it up in luxury condos that didn't sell

Glut of unsold condos in some cities gives urban professionals a chance to enjoy new buildings with lots of amenities for less.

By Teresa at MSN Real Estate Jun 3, 2011 12:21PM

© Kelly Redinger/JupiterimagesA glut of unsold luxury condos is providing a great opportunity for renters, who are finding deals on new buildings with lots of amenities.

 

It's not bargain living, but it's a lot cheaper than buying in those buildings would have been, especially during the boom.

For $2,630, tenants can get a 600-square-foot studio in Frank Gehry's New York by Gehry, the tallest residential tower in the world. And it's rent-stabilized, so the price won't rise precipitously in the future.

 

"People are liking the fact that they don't have to commit to a mortgage and a large dollar amount to live here," MaryAnne Gilmartin, executive vice president of Forest City Ratner, the building's developer, told The Associated Press.

 

In Miami, the once nearly empty condo buildings constructed near the end of the housing boom are home to tenants who are enjoying waterfront views and a vibrant urban lifestyle they could never have afforded before.

"Five years ago, you wouldn’t have kids fresh out of college living in luxury like this," Brandon Klein, 26, told Bloomberg. He shares a $2,700-a-month waterfront condo in downtown Miami with two roommates, giving them access to a 24-hour concierge, gym, spa and steam room.

 

Post continues below

 

In some cases, developers are turning condos they had planned to sell into rental apartments. In others, investors are taking advantage of plummeting prices and buying units to rent out.

Either way, it's a boon for tenants.

 

The upscale buildings and amenities appeal to urban professionals who aren't sure they want to buy into an uncertain real-estate market.

 

As Michelle Conlin of The Associated Press writes:

Conflicting signals about the market have only added to the allure of renting for those who might otherwise buy. Prices and interest rates are low. But lending standards are strict. Supply is abundant. But so are the forecasts that the U.S. could be in for a lost decade of sideways house prices. It's led to a resurgence in people taking advantage of the "renter's subsidy," the idea that while real-estate prices are stuck or moving lower, it's better — and cheaper — to rent premium real estate than it is to buy. 
Tags: rentals
16Comments
Jul 13, 2011 7:48AM
avatar
If you factor in things like not needing a car and being able to use public transportation to and from work it really isn't that bad. For myself I would rather be paying 37% less and buying a 3800' house with a pool in FL than live in NYC.
Jun 17, 2011 7:31PM
avatar
And if the average weekly income in NYC was $1450 five years ago, then that means that half of the people make more than that.  That's millions of people and many of them can afford a $2600 rent - which is by all means considered a low rent in many Manhattan neighborhoods.   It's not for everyone but it is for some.  Live and let live without criticizing others for living differently than you.  There is always animosity towards people who have money or wealth.  I don't understand it.  Most of us have the ability to work hard to get what we want in life.  Many people do not live up to their full potential for many reasons but that's no reason to criticize those who do.  If anything, people can learn from them. 
Jun 17, 2011 7:21PM
avatar
That is a good deal for NYC.  If someone can afford the rent and really wants to live that type of lifestyle - then good for them.  Most people who can afford such rent work very hard to earn their 6+ figure salaries.  I currently cannot afford that type of rent but even if I could, I would not choose to live in NYC and get 600 sq. feet for $2600.  I would pay $2600 for an apt twice that size where I live in NJ - less than 5 minutes from Manhattan.  My point is that people should not criticize others who have money and can afford things that many can not.  It's a good thing when people earn money and can afford what they want.  It's not their fault that others can't afford it.  Many of these posts wreak of envy and it is not appealing. 
Jun 17, 2011 4:13PM
avatar
Wow, wonder what a cup of coffee costs in New York?
Jun 17, 2011 3:54PM
avatar

$600 or more a week for a studio apartment is considered "not bad"? People are complaining the economy is in shambles. It looks more like peoples standards are in shambles. I guess if you choose to pay 600 a week for rent then your employment situation must be precarious at best in slack times.

Jun 17, 2011 3:22PM
avatar
It's not for the median income earner. I live here, and I agree it's a lot of money but there are a bunch of people that can afford that in this area.
Jun 17, 2011 2:03PM
avatar
Who are you kidding with this crap. I did a search of the internet for median income in New York City. Average income in Manhattan was $1450 weekly in 2006. That does not give you enough cash to make 2600 a month cheap rent! If you are spending more than a quarter of your wages on rent you are spending too much.
Jun 17, 2011 1:14PM
avatar
The wages are higher in New York because the cost of living is higher.  That's very affordable for NYC actually.  When I was looking for student housing for my son, The price point seemed to hover right around $2000 for $500 sq. ft or less and most of them were dumps! 
Jun 17, 2011 1:01PM
avatar
$2600 for NYC isn't all that bad - and renting does not equal buying (at least not in that building).  Renting doesn't usually incur the condo fees, that's usually paid by whoever own the unit and is already factored into the rent.  Also what they aren't telling you is that building has massive amenities.  A library, a 50 foot indoor pool, a giant gym, group fitness, a spa etc. You can also see central park from the building, which means it's in one of the most desirable areas of the city. So if you're comparing to other states and other cities it just isn't going to be the same. Not to mention that this building isn't for average wage earners, it's for those that can afford rent but might not be able to buy. 
Jun 17, 2011 12:49PM
avatar
WOW -- $2,630/month for a tiny 600 SF efficiency apartment in NYC!  How can the average wage earner afford to live in that city?
Jun 4, 2011 5:02AM
avatar
well 2700.00 X 12 = 34000.00 + you need to figure in condo fees too,  lets say 450.00 a month that equals to 5400.00 so in all for 600 square feet in New York it will cost you $39400.00, ouch... Now look at that for 30 years, $1,182,000.00. So I wonder will a 600 foot condo in New York really worth 1.2 mil?  But yet people do buy these very small condo's just to say they own New York real estate.
Jun 4, 2011 2:58AM
avatar
If you can afford that kind of rent, you can afford to buy a place.  Economics 101- Better to own then rent.  You may not live the high life as in this article, but at least you are not padding the pockets of the landlord.  Your are investing in your own pocketbook.  Don't get stuck in the rent game.  Now is the time to buy.  Rates will never be this low again.
Jun 3, 2011 9:50PM
avatar
Wait until the renters trash the condos. Then we will see what they are worth. If I owned a condo, I would not allow renters. Renters trash condos. I have only one rental left. The previous renters caused $25,602 in damages. The middle age couple had excellent credit to boot.
avatar
I've been renting in condominiums in Chicago for the last 30 years, and I will be the first one to tell you that renters in a condominium are the worst thing for a condo.  They destroy the property values of the unit owners because renters simply don't have a vested interest in the condominium and they don't care about the property values.  If that's not honest, I don't know what is.  If I were a unit owner, I would vote to keep renters out.
Jun 3, 2011 3:52PM
avatar

 $2600 for 600 sqft condo.  What a ripoff.   I'm sure all those people making minimum wa are thrilled to learn that their money keeps them in the ghetto while snobs and spoiled rich kids live the live in a box paid for by mommy and daddy's trustfunds.

 

Anyone that would pay $2600 for a 600 sqft condo for rent is STUPID!

Jun 3, 2011 2:37PM
avatar

"$2630 gets you 600 sq.ft"

 

Maybe by NYC standards that's a deal.....but the equivalent of 20'X30' doesn't seem like the jackpot to me. I've seen a lot of houses with living rooms that big, with a mortgage payment far less than that kind of rent.

 

 

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

About Teresa Mears

Teresa Mears

Teresa Mears is a veteran journalist who has been interested in houses since her father took her to tax auctions to carry the cash at age 10. A former editor of The Miami Herald's Home & Design section, she lives in South Florida where, in addition to writing about real estate, she publishes Miami on the Cheap to help her neighbors adjust to the loss of 60% of their property value.

FIND YOUR DREAM HOME OR APARTMENT

or

WHAT'S YOUR HOME WORTH?

    

HOME IMPROVEMENT PROFESSIONALS

Find local plumbers, electricians, contractors and more.

from our partners