Loading the slideshow
The slideshow requires script be turned on to function.
FIND YOUR DREAM HOME OR APARTMENT
The truth of the matter is, you need green to go green. As a middle class American I can not afford to go out and buy 10-12 solor panels to put on my roof that will charge costly batteries so I can have toast. Nor can I shell-out 40 grand for a hybrid car. I care about the environment as much as anyone, so I recycle like a mad woman, I drive a fuel efficeint car and a motorcycle when it's comfortable out. I use creek water for my plants, I make my own compost, and I pee twice before flushing. Can't get much greener than that.
There seems to be a mistaken notion that going "green" will save money. Thats wrong. It may help the environment in some ways, but it does cost more. People in construction know this. The news is so misleading. If we produce and distribute energy more efficiently and let private innovation(not government)deal with the side effects we will save time money and the environment.
BTW, I would never fill my stud bays with spray foam unless it was an experiment!
This entire article is a crock.........$100 to insulate a house? Solar panels like in the picture for
$100-$600?......Where are you going to get fire insurance for a straw bale insulated house?....
and a green roof?.....expensive, energy consuming projects just so you can feel good about being "green"?........this is on the MSN page?.....WTF?.....this is trash......
LOL, straw bale insulation? It rots, holds moisture, has mold, and can be a feeding ground for lots of pests. It's nostalgic, but it's silly to mention it in a serious article about insulation.
Wisely, in another part of the article, it is mentioned that common batt insulation is cheap, manufactured for the purpose of insulating, has vapor barriers, won't rot, and easy to install. LOL, straw bales?
Best (or worst) part about the fluorescent bulbs is the pollutants that they make manufacturing them. And the 'hazardous' elements in them. Technically, if you break one, you would need to call a haz-mat team to clean it up. And when they get thrown away and broken and all the mercury, etc., seeps into the groundwater...............................
Gotta love the green idiots that think 'saving the planet' requires switching from a possible pollution that can be fixed by trees, to an eternal, heavy element source of pollution that can't be cleaned up. If they keep 'saving us', pretty soon we will all be dead.
Re SOLAR UPGRADE:
The alternative view to ROI is cash-flow quantification. In my case:
- How much will Southern California Edison gouge me for electricity every month? 2010 Avg = $170 for a 12-month period.
- Given the rebates available on a 2.25kWh system, what is my realistic cost? About 14K (8K in rebates).
- How much does that cost to finance on an ING Home Equity Line of Credit fixed Loan over 15 years? Approx $100/month @ 4%.
- How much does my average SCE bill reduce by? $90+/month (low-side estimate).
- Cash flow impact? Close to a wash in 2011, but positive thereafter (see 6!)...
- How much will SCE raise rates each year? 7% (published for 2012).
- How much does that affect me? Negligible because it's for the top 3 tiers, which I'll be supplying via solar.
- Do I care about ROI? Not at all, because my cash-flow will either go to Edison (increasing), or to my Loan (fixed).
As was said in "Notting Hill", "Our perspectives are somewhat different!"
Something to think about...





















