Looking for an affordable rental market? Study says you're out of luck
March Rental Advice: The gap between tenant wages and housing costs is widening precipitously, forcing millions of Americans to make tough choices. Here's a look at what's happening with rent across the country, and some advice on what you can do if you're having trouble paying your rent.
© Kelly Redinger/Jupiter images
For middle- and low-income tenants, things just keep getting worse.
Tenants know this: The rent keeps going up. Housing counselors know this: More working families are struggling to pay rent and are coming in to seek help, afraid they'll end up homeless. Now, here come the numbers.
First was the report in February from the federal Center for Housing Policy, which revealed that an astonishing 1 in 4 working households in America — around 10.6 million families — spend more than half of their pre-tax income on housing, a level that experts say is unhealthy, if not impossible, to sustain.
Then on Tuesday came the latest exhaustive and dismal data crunch from the National Low Income Housing Coalition: "Out of Reach 2012," which finds that in no community in America is it possible to reasonably make the rent on minimum wage. In 86% of counties surveyed, even the average pay of tenants, which is about twice the minimum wage, won't cut it.
"There's a very serious gap between what rents cost and the amount of money that low-wage workers and elderly and disabled people or those on SSI (Supplemental Security Income) can afford," says Sheila Crowley, the president and CEO of the coalition. "It's obviously worse in some places than in others, but no place is rent-affordable."
The coalition study uses fair-market rent, the 40th percentile of area rent, and actual wage levels from U.S. labor surveys. It defines "affordable" housing as costing no more than 30% of gross income, the widely recommended standard. Nationally, the average fair-market rent for a two-bedroom home in 2012 is $949, meaning a full-time worker would need to make $18.25 an hour to pay rent without unduly straining the family budget, $4.10 more than the average tenant wage of $14.15 and 2.5 times the federal minimum wage of $7.25. You can use this tool to calculate your own housing wage.
- On our blog, 'Listed': NYC rent control may go to Supreme Court
"It isn't just fixed-income seniors or the unemployed. It's also a big challenge for working people," says Sean Caron, director of public policy for the Citizens' Housing and Planning Association, a Massachusetts advocacy group. "This is really a problem that isn't reserved to a small amount of vulnerable people."
Working overtime to pay the rent
The Center for Housing Policy study looks at the housing budgets of working families, defined as those employed at least 20 hours a week and earning no more than 120% of area median household income.
Of the 22.5 million working families who rent, 26% give more than half their pre-tax income to the landlord. That's an increase of 12% since 2008, or an additional 630,000 families. In California, Florida and New Jersey, fully 1 in 3 households join the "severely housing-cost burdened."
- MSN Money: Do renters ruin a neighborhood?
"Retail, firefighter, teacher, postal clerk – those are all pretty good jobs," says Laura Williams, the report's author. "They're essential community workers, and they're not making enough to rent a two-bedroom apartment in a lot of communities."
Those in the increasingly busy business of helping tenants aren't surprised by the findings. Take the counselors at the Metropolitan Boston Housing Partnership. They typically get about 9,000 requests for assistance a year. Lately that number has ballooned to 15,000, many from struggling tenants with jobs.
"We used to see the more chronically homeless folks, and there still is a great need there, but we're also seeing the increase of the moderate-income family," says Kate Fulton, who helps direct client services for the agency.
One single mother working full-time in the medical field was spending more than 80% of her $2,300 monthly pay for a moderately priced three-bedroom home, leaving only $400 for other expenses.
"She's not behind on rent. She manages," says Kate Jordan, coordinator of the consumer education center for the housing partnership. "I don't have a good answer for how she does it, but she's doing it."
The woman knew it was unsustainable, however, and counselors were able to help her find a cheaper apartment. She's also working to boost her earnings.
"That's a really high percentage of income to go toward housing and be sustainable, and you've got to ask how long people can keep that up and what choices they're being forced to make," Caron says. "Making the math work is really tough."
How did it happen?
So how did the squeeze on average workers get so incredibly tight? Several forces are at work:
- An improved economy. People are getting jobs and moving out on their own. Young professionals soak up the pool of moderately priced apartments.
- Buying jitters. Would-be buyers continue to be unable or unwilling to finance a home purchase. So they rent, adding 2 million more tenants to the market since before the housing bust.
- Not enough rentals. It takes time to approve and build rental housing. We have not had an increase in units to match the rise in renters.
- A long-term shortage of affordable rentals. Motivating investors to incorporate affordable rentals into developments is a chronic struggle, although creative solutions exist.
Combined, this makes for intense demand, and national vacancy rates are at their lowest level in more than a decade. With prices spiking as a result, it can be near impossible in many areas to find an open unit at the fair-market rent cited by the study.
Even high-income tenants are feeling the pinch. In New York City and San Francisco, both markets that traditionally favor tenants, high rents have sent would-be tenants on the buying path for the first time, ironically, to save money.
Now add to the mix stagnating wages for those in the middle, and declining wages for those at the bottom. While the national median monthly rent for working households rose 4% from 2008 to 2010, the median household income of tenants dropped 4%, the Center for Housing Policy found.
The increase in severely housing-burdened Americans from 2007 to 2009, the most recent years surveyed, was dramatic, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, with 7.1 million poor households either spending more than half their income on rent, living in substandard conditions, or both.
You really don't know anything about money, banking or economics do you?
It probably would have been better to let those banks fail. But since Congress in 1998 had this great idea of getting rid of what FDR did which was to seperate investment bankers from the regular bankers everyone was going to lose their butts not just the Goldman Sach's of the world
It actually started with gov't not doing its job regulating banks and letting securitize home loans, selling these securities while at the same time not regulating the insurance companies so that for a few extra bucks they could insure those securities against losses
Loans were being written in the sub prime market long before fannie and freddie had to match them or go out of business. The government should have been regulating fanny and freddie also but of course they were to busy calling each other wacko's socialists to actually do what they were supposed to be doing.
I make about $18 bucks an hour and I work full time so roughty arround 2,800 a month or 37,000 dollars a year,pretax I pay taxes and usually break even I don't usually owe to huge or get much back either. But when the average rent is about a 1,000 bucks a month in Alaska for a 1 bedroom apartment not including utilites, car payment, ect ect ect.... 30 years ago 37,000 a year used to be able to buy a decent home and a decent lifestyle nothing fancy but decent. the problem is people wanted to get rich at the drop of a dime and wanted to strike gold rather than having wait and earn a reasonable living so a house that now costs someone 70,000 dollars to build now means you want to charge 200,000 dollars to sell it not 100,000s and then reinvest into the next property. and have a reasonable stable living, Have you noticed that it's the things that we need in life that the pricing is so out of control $4 gas, $1,000 a month dump to live in. houses out of peoples reach
Just saying stop with the finger pointing. It's broken and has been broken for decades. The middle class was killed well before Bush sr., Clinton, Bush jr., and Obama., It's not about getting a free shake or people not working, It's about wanting a fair bite at the apple. Will exxon really miss a couple billion dollars.
For once the author makes a point sort of............ I own a real estate company that also manages over 100 rentals for various clients......... they are not the evil landlords........ their profit margin is not what you think it is......... some people are able to buy houses now and turn them into rentals having never done this before and hopefully they are using a good rental company of manage them - going rate is 10% of the rent and we earn every penny of it. Now as for the job recovery and renting.......... the so-called job recovery is a JOKE JOKE JOKE - open your eyes - do you see people in your area with full-time manufacturing jobs - NO! Do you see people out shopping for frivolous things - NO! What you see are people taking whatever kind of job they can to put food on the table and a roof over their heads - and I don't see it getting better - people are out there looking for rentals under $600 a month and they are hard to find - usually a 1 bedroom 1 bath 800 sq ft and God forbid if you should have a pet ! Pets are family too ! If I had a HUGE apartment complex that allowed pets - I would have it FULL constantly........ OBAMA does not get it and all of you that believe these so called JOBS are making it better - you DON'T get it AT ALL........
When are these moronic, silver spoon fed bureaucrats going to get real? On one article, I saw the "median national income" was listed as $23.31 per hour. People up here in the true northeast, (not the cities,) would consider that a high income.
It's time those fools go out of their "safe" zones, and actually got out into the hinterland and checked things out, for a reality check. And I mean actually go to the coffee shops and restaurants in the smaller towns. They might just get an earful of what life is actually like.
My daughter and son-in-law both work full time, and have a family with three kids at home. If my wife and I didn't own the house they live in, they would be on the streets, because they couldn't afford the rent, even as low as they are up here.
That is the problem with a government giving to people that do NOT appreciate what they have, and there being nothing left for the people that would really appreciate the help.
Not that there is no money. This overdrawn government is giving billions to the big cities, where they get the mass of votes, (and don't forget the cemeteries.) There is nothing left for the people actually paying the bills.
I am not blaming any one political party, I'm blaming ALL those hypocrites. They all talk a good game, but they are so interested in ensuring they have enough money for their own reelection, they totally disregard the REAL taxpayers.