The cost of living near nuclear power

Financial upside: Better standard of living

Let's start with the obvious question: Is it safe to live near a nuclear plant?

"Absolutely; study after study has shown this," Miller says. "The bizarre fact is, cancer rates and risks in general are lower around plants. That has nothing to do with the plant itself, but instead with the higher standard of living of the people who live and work there. They have good-paying jobs, they take care of themselves, they have the money to pay for medical care."

Von Meier begs to differ. "(Nuclear power) is obviously very dangerous, very susceptible to mistakes, and I don't believe it's necessary because I am more optimistic that renewable resources can supply a very, very high percentage of our needs."

But von Meier admits her concerns have as much to do with who's operating the plant as they do with nuclear power itself.

"I wouldn't buy a house next to a random reactor because I don't know the training and the culture of the people who operate it, which is not generally accessible," she says. "I think this issue of transparency has been a major problem."

• MSN Money: How to complain and win

• Bing: How safe is nuclear power?

• Video: Is the nuclear age over?

• On our blog, 'Listed': 'Green' island home with a view

Potential health costs

A nuclear accident nearby poses two main health threats: direct radiation from the damaged reactor and ingestion, typically by breathing, of a radioactive isotope such as iodine-131 or cesium-137 that has become airborne from an explosion.

Ingestion is the greater health threat because of its potential to concentrate radiation within the body. Iodine-131 typically leads to cancer of the thyroid, especially in children. Cesium-137 can contribute to a wide variety of cancers.

Direct radiation, by contrast, dissipates rapidly the farther away you are from the source. "Distance is obviously a very large player here, as is the direction of the wind," Miller says.

So how close is too close?

"A 10-mile or so radius is more than sufficient," Miller says. "There is always the statistical chance of cancer in the future, but in the Japanese situation, with the doses we've seen, even the workers at the plant might have a one-half percent to 1% increased cancer risk over their lifetimes. A mile away, that radiation level is way, way down by comparison."

• Video: Nuclear neighbors debate future
  
  
• Bing Cube: View photos of the aftermath of a nuclear accident
  
  
• Bankrate.com: 5 tips for first-time homebuyers

Extra work to protect home

Here's the 411 on disaster-proofing your home:

Despite a plethora of products that purport to block radiation, including metallic paints and lead-lined drywall, direct radiation will blow right through them just as it does through the pressurized metal cabins of commercial aircraft.

You can, however, inexpensively block 95% of the more dangerous airborne particles by using plastic sheeting and duct tape to create airtight barriers over all door, window and chimney openings, according to ABC's Richard Besser.

What you really need is a strategy to make your home "passively survivable" for an extended stay inside your makeshift oversized "Glad bag."

Roberts offers these suggestions:

• Photovoltaic solar panels: Two panels may be enough to power your gas furnace, refrigerator, water pump or laptop indefinitely.
• Rainwater harvesting: Roof runoff stored in a closed rain barrel or buried cistern comes in handy when the town water is shut off or contaminated.
• Orientation: When building in warm climates, orient your home on an east-west axis with windows on northern and southern exposures to reduce sun exposure. In colder climates, use a north-south axis with windows facing south for solar heat gain.

• Bing: How safe is nuclear power?

• Video: Is the nuclear age over?

• On our blog, 'Listed': 'Green' island home with a view

Do you have to get nuclear insurance?

You won't find nuclear coverage in your standard homeowners insurance policy. In fact, it specifically excludes nuclear hazard liability to avoid sharing this largely uncharted risk.

But the main reason you can't purchase nuclear insurance is Americans already have it, thanks to a nuclear industry contingency fund mandated by Congress in 1957.

In the same year that President Dwight Eisenhower's "Atoms for Peace" program launched the nation's first nuclear plant at Shippingport, Pa., Congress enacted the Price-Anderson Act. It requires all nuclear-plant operators to maintain an insurance fund, currently at about $12.9 billion, to pay liability claims for personal injury, sickness, disease and death, property damage and loss, and living expenses for displaced people resulting from a commercial nuclear-plant accident.

To date, that fund has paid out $71 million in claims resulting from the 1979 accident at Three Mile Island.

"The nuclear program really completely hinges on many billions of dollars of federal money being spent to shore it up," von Meier says. "It is not viable in the private sector alone, starting with liability insurance; you can't get it, we have to underwrite it as a society."

• Video: Nuclear neighbors debate future
  
  
• Bing Cube: View photos of the aftermath of a nuclear accident
  
  
• Bankrate.com: 5 tips for first-time homebuyers

Are nuclear plants a buyer turnoff?

The Atomic Energy Commission once envisioned that America would have 1,000 nuclear reactors online by 2000. Public protests and safety concerns after Three Mile Island trimmed those hopes dramatically. Today, America has 104 reactors at 64 commercial nuclear facilities, some near major cities such as Boston, Los Angeles and New York.

Do good nukes make good neighbors? It seems so, judging by the 2010 U.S. Census, which found that the number of people living within 10 miles of a nuclear plant increased by 17% over the last decade. If you expand the radius to 50 miles, one in three Americans (116 million) now lives within the nuclear neighborhood.

Most plants are next to bodies of water away from large populations, two natural draws for many homebuyers.

Miller says it's ironic that suburban sprawl is closing in on America's once-remote nuclear plants.

"Ours are remotely sited; some of us in the industry think maybe to excess," he says. "In Europe, some plants are located fairly near towns where (nuclear) waste heat is actually used for heating and industrial purposes."

Then again, nuclear housing markets are always just one plant accident away from a meltdown.

• Bing: How safe is nuclear power?

• Video: Is the nuclear age over?

• On our blog, 'Listed': 'Green' island home with a view